RESUMO
La Comisión de Test del Consejo General de la Psicología en España promueve anualmente la revisión de la calidad de diferentes test publicados. Este trabajo tiene un doble objetivo: a) presentar los resultados de la octava edición y b) considerar la aportación dela universidad en dicho proceso. En esta edición participaron 10 especialistas, 332 estudiantes y siete profesores, adaptándose el protocolo estándar de revisión al formato aprendizaje-servicio. En cuanto a los resultados, la calidad de los 11 test evaluados fue adecuada (promedio de 3,9 puntos en una escala 1-5) y similar a años anteriores (r = 0,90). El desarrollo y la baremación fueron puntos fuertes, mientras que se proponen mejoras en otros aspectos. El aprendizaje-servicio contribuyó a la diversificación de voces en el proceso observándose una calidad similar entre los informes del estudiantado y los emitidos por especialistas y un grado de acuerdo esperable (r = 0,67) entre ellos. Concluimos que el presente proyecto ha permitido identificar la oportunidad de profundizaren el uso de lenguaje compartido para fortalecer la comunicación entre las casas editoriales, la comisión promotora del modelo español de revisión de test, y las personas usuarias de los test, particularmente si se trata de principiantes. (AU)
Every year, the Test Commission of the Spanish Psychological Association promotes the assessment of the test quality of several published tests. The aim of the present study is two-fold: a) to present results for the eighth review, and b) to consider the contribution of the universities in this process. Ten experts, 332 students, and seven professors participated in this edition and the standardprotocol for review was aligned towards a service-learning format. For the 11 tests assessed, results showed an adequate quality(average of 3.9 points on a 1-5 rating scale) similar to previous years (r = .90). The strengths were test development andstandardization, and a number of proposals for improving other sections were suggested. The service-learning approach contributed to the diversification of voices in the process with students and experts reports showing similar quality and an expectedlevel of agreement (r = .67). We conclude that this project has helped to identify the opportunity to further deepen the use of shared language in order to strengthen the communication between the test publishers, the promoters of the Spanish model of testassessment, and the test users, especially in the case of beginners. (AU)
Assuntos
Humanos , Testes Psicológicos , Psicometria , Aprendizagem , EspanhaRESUMO
Los instrumentos de medida estandarizados (tests) se han convertido en una herramienta imprescindible en las ciencias de la salud. En los estándares para pruebas educativas y psicológicas publicados en 1999 por la American Educational Research Association, la American Psychological Association y el National Council on Measurement in Education se introduce el concepto de equidad en el desarrollo, la adaptación y la administración de los tests psicométricos. A pesar de su innegable relevancia, este concepto ha sido poco utilizado en el mundo de la salud pública y la epidemiología. Por ello, la presente nota metodológica tiene como objetivo explicar el concepto de equidad en los tests y dar herramientas e indicaciones para detectar y solventar su uso no equitativo (AU)
Standardized measurement instruments (tests) have become an essential tool in health sciences. The concept of equity in the development, adaptation and administration of psychometric tests was first introduced in «Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing» published in 1999 by the American Educational Research Association, the American Psychological Association, and the National Council on Measurement in Education. Despite its importance, this concept has been scarcely used in epidemiology and public health. Consequently, this methodological note aims to explain the concept of equity in testing and to provide tools and indications to detect and solve their inequitable use (AU)
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Testes Psicológicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Testes Psicológicos/normas , Viés , Equidade em Saúde , /normas , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , /métodos , /organização & administração , /tendênciasRESUMO
Standardized measurement instruments (tests) have become an essential tool in health sciences. The concept of equity in the development, adaptation and administration of psychometric tests was first introduced in "Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing" published in 1999 by the American Educational Research Association, the American Psychological Association, and the National Council on Measurement in Education. Despite its importance, this concept has been scarcely used in epidemiology and public health. Consequently, this methodological note aims to explain the concept of equity in testing and to provide tools and indications to detect and solve their inequitable use.
